How I keep track of unique hundos is the tags. I only tag the highest evolved member of each family, while any ârepeatâ hundos I have are not tagged but can be found using the â4*â tag.
To that point, when they introduced the hundo Pokedex some time ago, it doesnât âaccurately showâ which hundos Iâve encountered retroactively, but does update when I do afterwards. Itâs strange they did this with hundos, but not with Shinies.
Essentially, the way I track my hundos looks something like this:
Wow, never had this problem because I donât evolve before having another one.
But now, what do you all want to do?
Do we use the data which shows the program, or do we use what we as users count individually?
Really, for me it doesnât matter if the data is correct or not. I believe in the spirit of all of us. But if you are near to 600 unique Hundos, than you can imagine that I have no energy to count them manually.
fwiw, I stopped looking specifically for 0 IV at least a year ago, when I started checking specific IV only for 3* and usually transfer anything 0* or 1*. I suspect Iâve thrown away a few nundos since then (but saved several hours of closer-examination time)
Since you mentioned it, then I want to say that I had caught just over 10,000 Pokemon and had got 20 Perfect species, though only 14 them are in my storage.
Itâs all relative⊠I love the Hundos, and play searching them. So in my previous account I had more than 600, and in the actual account I have more than 200 and rising. Itâs just a playing style.
